TRANSLATION:
My E-Mail:
Dear Ms. Hansjosten,
I am sorry for the inconvenience and that I might send this to the wrong person - but I have a problem with the aforementioned episode of the show “Betrugsfälle”.
Even though it does turn out over the course of the episode that there has been no actual sexual intercourse, things are being said that I deem plain unacceptable.
In short: It is claimed that sexual intercourse between a sober employee(!) of a club and a drunk customer(!) is not rape.
Please - are you serious? A drunk person is not able to give full consent to such activities. The employee is doing nothing but taking advantage of a helpless person.
I hope that you pay more attention to these things in the future - this is rape as well. Rape is one of the least-reported crimes, among other reasons because victims are told that this kind of rape isn’t “real” rape.
Kind regards,
Elisabeth Enzi
Ms. Hansjosten’s answer:
Dear Ms. Enzi,
Thank you for your Mail.I watched the episode you mentioned and agree with you in all points. I will prohibit a re-run of this episode during daytime. I will also instruct the editors of this show again so this difficult topic will be handled sensitively in the future.
I hope I could help you.
Kind regards,
Daniela Hansjosten.
###
I am really proud of myself for writing the e-mail to the TV station. And I am glad I got this kind of answer.
Some context: “I just wrote an E-Mail to a German TV station because they displayed a sober employee(!) of a club having sex with a piss drunk customer(!) who had also been given Liquid X(!!!) as not-rape.”
via turtle-fence (http://turtle-fence.tumblr.com/)

